Unions Veer Sharply to the Left

Unions Veer Sharply to the Left

Amongst the deadly sins is envy. It is a malevolent undercurrent, a darkish aspect of human nature that despises success. And throughout historical past, envious individuals have sought to undermine and subvert the greatest in us.

Any effort to progress in society is sabotaged by this group of people. The late Dr. Jack Wheeler referred to as it the Evil Eye. He quoted sociologist Helmut Schoeck, who describes it in “Envy: A Theory of Social Behaviour” as:

“A self-pitying inclination to contemplate another’s superiority or advantages, combined with a vague belief in his being the cause of one’s own deprivation. … Whereas the socialist believes himself robbed by the employer, just as the politician in a developing country believes himself robbed by the industrial countries, so primitive man believes himself robbed by his neighbor, the latter having succeeded by black magic in spiriting away to his own fields, part of the former’s harvest.”

How transparent that communist idealists claim to promote a world of selfless purity whereas promising their potential converts a bounty of spoils to be confiscated from the “selfish” wealthy. Is it any marvel that each one their “workers’ paradises” with out exception devolve into ruthless, parasitic kleptocracies unable or unwilling to even feed their very own?

Yet that’s what America’s radical left needs for us. Their whole edifice has been constructed on the primitive emotion of envy. We’re seeing this agenda being acted out writ giant before us each day now.

Much of America’s union leadership personifies that malevolent, damaging ardour, seasoned with a healthy dose of greed, and they are using unions, typically towards the will of the rank-and-file, to acquire “justice.” They have turn out to be a toxic spear, thrust deep into the coronary heart of America’s spirit, and right now threaten our very way of life. How did we get here?

Union Historical past

Since their infancy, unions in the United States have been relentlessly focused by communist activists. Nearly each radical leftist movement identifies with unions as organizations of the proletariat, and sees them as the car to result in their utopian vision.

The American labor motion was heavily influenced by socialist ideas, however union leader Samuel Gompers and his American Federation of Labor (AFL), based in 1886, regularly drifted away, looking for accommodation with enterprise. He believed in organizing skilled tradesmen. Proscribing entry via trade unions would both keep wages within these trades and provide higher bargaining energy with employers, in order to get hold of the trade unionists’ “fair day’s wages for a fair day’s work.”

Industrial unions sought to arrange all staff, expert and unskilled, in all industries, and had rather more radical intentions. Communists, anarchists, syndicalists, anarcho-syndicalists, and different union radicals found their residence in Eugene Debs’s Industrial Staff of the World (IWW, or “Wobblies”) group, birthed in 1905.

The Wobblies used to be ridiculed in historical past books, but they’re nonetheless around, plying their trade, a lot of which has little to do with employee rights. For instance, they’ve a Gender Equity Committee, a Buddies of Palestine Staff Group, and a Basic Defense and Worldwide Solidarity Group.

The IWW brazenly declares its class warfare ideology: “The capitalist class of bosses, financiers, landlords, and their cops wage relentless and violent class war upon the working class.”

The preamble to the IWW constitution starts with the following assertion: “The working class and the employing class have nothing in common. There can be no peace so long as hunger and want are found among millions of the working people and the few, who make up the employing class, have all the good things of life.”

This overt statement of sophistication envy reveals IWW’s main motivation. Envy is the system utilized by all communists. It’s also a lie. The U.S. center class is best off than some other in the world. And whereas we’d sympathize with America’s ghetto poor, the poorest U.S. citizen has more materials wealth than most other individuals in the world, particularly the communist world. The poorest individuals in the United States are higher off than Russia’s prime 10 %.

Industrial unions consider in an eventual showdown with capitalism. They are prepared to accept accommodation in the brief run, but finally no reconciliation is possible. The radicals promise that when they acquire sufficient energy, capitalism shall be completely destroyed.

The IWW uses, in its emblem and flags, the pink and black of the anarcho-syndicalists—i.e., revolutionary industrial unions, of which IWW is one. The same shade scheme is seen in at present’s Antifa flags. They’re the similar factor, anarchy and communism.

The left makes frequent use of symbolism. Former President Barack Obama described himself as “a union guy.” The night time of his 2008 victory speech, he, his spouse, and youngsters all dressed in the symbolic purple and black of anarcho-syndicalists. He was possible signaling his specific form of unionism to his fellow radicals. Michelle, meanwhile, doubled the message by sporting a ghastly gown featuring the ubiquitous red-on-black hourglass sample of the black widow spider.

Purge of Union Communists

Communist activism in unions was undermined for a time. The Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO), an industrial union that had many communists in influential positions, started purging these members first beneath the management of Phillip Murray, then underneath Walter Reuther in the 1940s.

They have been aided on this effort by the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947, passed by Congress throughout one among two temporary durations of Republican control. Its best-known provision was a requirement that union leaders sign non-communist affidavits, which have been later declared unconstitutional.

As a radical industrial union, the CIO had been bitter enemies with the AFL, but over time the AFL began to settle for industrial unions while CIO’s leadership turned markedly less radical. The two organizations merged in 1955. The communists meanwhile, went underground, but never actually disappeared.

At the moment, they’re again with a vengeance, and this explains the frequent sightings of communists, socialists, and other radicals marching arm-in-arm in road protests with union members proudly displaying their union banners. Overlook about “workers’ rights.”

This began in 1995, when the AFL-CIO elected the “New Voice” leadership group of John Sweeney, then head of the Service Staff International Union (SEIU), Richard Trumka, president of United Mine Staff, and Linda Chavez-Thompson of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Staff (AFSCME).

All three are radical leftists with communist ties. Sweeney is a proud member of Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), the largest socialist group in the United States. Both Sweeney and Trumka acquired the Eugene V. Debs Award in 1994, along with writer and activist Barbara Ehrenreich, covert Communist Social gathering member Howard Zinn, and a number of different radical leftists. Trumka informed Bloomberg News that “being called a socialist is a step up for me.”

These three lifted the decades-old ban on communists assuming union leadership positions, and welcomed Communist Get together members with open arms. In accordance to information supply WND, in 1996, CPUSA Nationwide Chairman Gus Hall said, “The radical shift in both leadership and policy is a very positive, even historic change.”

And so it has been—radical, anyway. Trumka, who is presently president of AFL-CIO, personifies the thuggish angle of at this time’s unions. As head of the United Mine Staff, Trumka referred to as a strike in 1993, telling strikers to “kick the [expletive] out of every last one” of the UMW members who didn’t go along. After non-union worker Eddie Cole was murdered by a putting UMW member, Trumka stated, “I’m saying if you strike a match and you put your finger in it, you’re likely to get burned.” Trumka and the UMW shortly settled a 4 yr, $27 million wrongful demise lawsuit with Cole’s wife when prosecutors threatened to launch evidence from the trial of the suspected killer.

In that very same strike, UMW thugs, according to the National Legal and Coverage Middle, “vandalized homes, fired gunshots at a mine office, and cut off the power supply to another mine, temporarily trapping 93 miners underground.” At a “Future of Unions” assembly in Detroit in April 2011, Trumka exclaimed, “Forget about the law; this is about more than that.”

The novel change in management at AFL-CIO signaled a change in course for unions general. The Democrat Celebration has all the time relied on unions for help, however most unions sought protections for American staff.

No extra. For instance, at this time’s unions are by-and-large in favor of mass immigration and amnesty for illegal aliens, no matter the value to American staff. A practical purpose could also be to improve dwindling membership, however the biggest cause is political. Unions have gotten behind a lot of the Democratic Social gathering’s agenda, no matter the value to its staff. And despite their extremism, at the moment’s unions are influential in spheres you wouldn’t anticipate. For instance, the AFL-CIO has a seat on the board of the New York Federal Reserve Bank.

Obama Period and Occupy

Each Trumka and then-SEIU President Andy Stern have been regular visitors to the Obama White Home. Trumka bragged that he spoke with the White Home every single day, while Stern gained distinction early on as the White House’s most frequent visitor.

Stern spent nearly all of his time utilizing his union influence for partisan politics. He even discovered partisan road techniques at the radical left coaching faculty Midwest Academy. Following his election as president of the SEIU in 1996, he introduced that he needed “every leader at every level of this union—from the international President to the rank-and-file member—to devote five working days this year to political action.”

With little doubt about his politics, Stern famously informed PBS’s Bill Moyers: “We’re trying to use the power of persuasion. And if that doesn’t work we’re going to use the persuasion of power.” He went on to quote Marx’s well-known slogan “Workers of the world unite,” and added, “It’s not just a slogan anymore.”

Stern helped write the notorious 2007 “Demographics Is Destiny” memo to billionare Democrat financier George Soros and other leftwing fat cats that described how mass immigration was changing the face of America and could get hold of undefeatable majorities for Democrats. Stern was joined by Anna Burger, dubbed the “Queen of Labor,” and leftist insider John Podesta.

Stern resigned from his SEIU place in 2010 beneath a cloud of corruption, however went on to create a coalition of unions named Change to Win. He had earlier withdrawn SEIU from AFL-CIO membership because he needed the AFL-CIO to proceed to spend money on Democratic politics, whereas AFL-CIO leadership needed to use it to build membership. Change to Win was the long-term consequence of his efforts to direct unions to extra political exercise.

SEIU might be the most radical of all unions and has a popularity for violence. Probably the most notorious example was the 2009 St. Louis, Missouri, town hall event when two SEIU thugs jumped and severely beat videographer Kenneth Gladney, a diminutive black Tea Get together member. Regardless of video evidence and the thugs describing in courtroom testimony how and why they beat Gladney, they have been let off.

In one other case, tons of of SEIU protesters swarmed the residence of Greg Baer, deputy basic counsel for corporate regulation at Bank of America, blowing bullhorns. Nobody was house except his 14-year-old son, who locked himself in his closet until his father returned.

Eliseo Medina, who was an honorary chair of Democratic Socialists of America, held several management positions at SEIU until lately and could also be the most outstanding amnesty advocate in the United States. At a 2009 Marketing campaign for America’s Future conference, he outlined the technique for the Democratic left to “create a governing coalition for the long term, not just for an election cycle” by granting amnesty to unlawful aliens.

Approximately 70 % of Hispanics vote Democrat. At the current levels of between 22 million and 30 million unlawful aliens in the United States, amnesty would give Democrats from 15 million to 21 million new voters. Recreation over. This is the actual cause Democrats refuse to budge on the wall. They need more illegal aliens right here. Unions have fallen in because that “win” would assure them unfettered energy for the foreseeable future as properly.

The American Federation of State, Municipal, and County Staff (AFSCME) has approximately 1.6 million members and is a member of the AFL-CIO. Till 2012, the AFSCME president was Gerald McEntee, a radical leftist who took management in 1981 following the demise of former AFSCME President Jerry Wurf. When John Sweeney assumed leadership of the AFL-CIO, McEntee turned AFL-CIO political committee chairman.

McEntee employed Paul Booth, co-founder of the aforementioned Midwest Academy. Booth had educated radicals to infiltrate unions. Now he might head the AFL-CIO’s “Union Summer” training camp, where he might train the whole AFL-CIO membership to be radicals. Sales space died in 2018 of cancer. Amongst different issues, McEntee’s AFSCME partnered with America Votes, a Soros-funded operation that targets political races in key states and jurisdictions.

The general public face of unions all the time parrots the latest leftist grievance. Professionally made pro-union signs are a well-known sight at left-wing protest rallies all over the country. From what appears on TV, you’d assume that the union rank and file are agitating for revolution. Nowadays they’re, but union demonstrations are carried out by paid professional agitators. That is their job.

Occupy Wall Road was not a spontaneous rebellion but planned anarchy. Kalle Lasn, publisher of Adbusters magazine and inspiration for Occupy, is an anarchist. Lead OWS organizer Lisa Fithian is an anarchist, and even spoke freely about it in an Al-Jazeera-produced propaganda history of OWS. Indicators of anarcho-syndicalism are also fairly evident in the Occupy Wall Road movement.

United Metal Staff boss Leo Gerard joined Fithian in the 1999 Seattle riots protesting the World Commerce Organization talks. He delivered 1,400 union thugs to assist out. As an adviser to Obama, he freely expressed his Occupy sympathies to MSNBC’s Ed Schultz: “You’re … right Wall Street occupiers speak for us. They do in Pittsburgh, they do in Chicago, they do in Oakland, they do in San Francisco, they do all across the country. And I think what we need is, we need more militancy.”

In another article written by left-wing activist Carl Davidson, Gerard was quoted as saying: “We don’t have a deficit crisis; we have a jobs crisis. And we better face up to the fact that we have to hit the streets, kick some [expletive], and mobilize to do something about it. We know we can’t do it alone. The labor movement can’t work in isolation from the environmental movement, in isolation from the women’s movement, the civil rights movement, and so on.” While he was talking about jobs, Gerard was inadvertently acknowledging that unions are a bit of the entire radical left movement.

Till the election of President Donald Trump, the Occupy movement was one in every of the left’s ugliest and most blatant expression of the virulent envy motif. Unions supported, funded, and took part in Occupy protests nationwide and have assisted in its more violent expressions—but, like a syphilitic blister, it’s merely the visible symptom of a toxic illness raging via the left’s political body, evident now more than ever.

As Trump brings unprecedented prosperity to all People, however especially minorities who’re having fun with the lowest unemployment rates in history, and as his economic insurance policies have engendered a rebirth of American business, the radical left is actually clamoring for his head.

Position of the Nationwide Schooling Association

The Communist Faculty for Social Research was established in Frankfurt Germany in 1923 underneath path of the Soviet KGB. Generally known as the Frankfurt Faculty, its objective was to “organize the intellectuals” to undermine the foundations of Western culture, and make it “so corrupt it stinks.” Following Karl Marx’s prescription to “criticize everything existing,” these scholars invented one thing referred to as crucial principle. In his seminal article “Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to Corrupt,” Timothy Matthews outlined important principle’s societal objectives:

  1. The creation of racism offenses
  2. Continuous change to create confusion
  3. The educating of sex and homosexuality to youngsters
  4. The undermining of faculties’ and academics’ authority
  5. Large immigration to destroy id
  6. The promotion of extreme consuming
  7. Emptying of churches
  8. An unreliable authorized system with bias towards victims of crime
  9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
  10. Control and dumbing down of media
  11. Encouraging the breakdown of the household

In 1933, principally Jewish Frankfurt Faculty professors had to flee Nazi Germany. John Dewey, the pro-Soviet, so-called “Father of Public Education,” helped reestablish the Frankfurt Faculty at Columbia University Academics School. As an NEA council member, Dewey introduced the NEA to Frankfurt Faculty leaders and significant principle ideas. The devastating consequences at the moment are ascendant in our public faculties, establishments, and tradition.

The NEA has carried out periodic surveys of its members since 1971 titled “Status of the American Public School Teacher.” The results may be surprising. In every survey since 1971, the overwhelming majority of academics recognized themselves as conservative. In the latest survey, revealed in 2005, 55 % of all academics described their political philosophies as conservative or tending to be conservative. Only 45 % categorised their political philosophies as tending to be liberal or liberal. It does not appear to have an effect on what they train or how they train it, nevertheless—that is dictated by the schooling paperwork.

Despite the conservative bent, in accordance to the Middle for Union Information, “between 1990 and 2010, 93 percent of donations made by National Education Association political action committees and individual officers went to Democrats.” Between 1989 and 2012, the equally radical American Federation of Academics spent more than 99 % of their political donations on Democrats. Republicans acquired zero.7 %. According to The Middle for Responsive Politics in 2018, 98.7 % of NEA political donations went to Democrats and liberal causes. Just one.three % went to Republicans and conservatives. The AFT spent $20 million (99.97 %) on Democrats, and a grand complete of $6,500 (0.032 %) on Republicans.

These figures underscore why Democrats and their union allies battle so exhausting to require union dues for all staff, whether or not or not they want to be in a union, and why they battled former Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker tooth and nail when he launched public employee union reform in that state.

However despite loyalty to the Democratic Get together, some unionists can’t overlook what Trump has achieved for the American worker. Last March, USW leader Leo Gerard stated of Trump’s efforts on metal, according to Real Clear Politics: “It’s going to make it very hard for our members to ignore what he just did and what makes me sad is we’ve been trying to get Democrats to this for more than 30 years. … All we’re asking for is a level playing field and with the president has done is send a signal that he’s going to help us get a level playing field.”

James Simpson is an economist, former White House price range analyst, businessman, and investigative journalist. His latest ebook is “The Red-Green Axis: Refugees, Immigration and the Agenda to Erase America.” Comply with Jim on Twitter and Fb.

Views expressed on this article are the opinions of the writer and do not essentially mirror the views of The Epoch Occasions.