In the 1970s, a good friend of mine, “Mike,” was an avid striped bass fisherman on the New Hampshire coast. He was drawn into an area environmental group, the Clamshell Alliance, after being informed that warm water from native nuclear energy crops would harm the striped bass fishery.
Mike was educated to sneak into the native power plant to spray-paint environmental slogans on the partitions. There were whisperings that some more-seasoned activists may be getting ready to commit more critical acts of sabotage.
At a Clamshell meeting one night time, Mike raised a clumsy question about the environmental value of a proposed tactic. He was pulled aside by a gaggle chief to be set straight. “Don’t you understand?” stated the leader. “Understand what?” stated Mike.
“We don’t give a [expletive] about the environment. We’re here to bring down American capitalism,” the chief replied.
In 1976, a letter appeared in the New Zealand Trotskyist newspaper Socialist Action, submitted by conservative labor leader Patrick Neary, in opposition to nuclear weapons and supporting “nuclear fusion power.” Socialist Motion editor Keith Locke replied: “Capitalism cannot be trusted with nuclear power … socialism … would step up nuclear power research in order to make it safe.”
Locke made little comment about the disastrous Chernobyl meltdown a decade later that blanketed a lot of the former Soviet Union and Japanese Europe in nuclear radiation.
Locke, who was raised by Stalinist mother and father, would additionally help Pol Pot’s conquest of Cambodia in 1978, and the brutal Soviet invasion of Afghanistan the following yr. This didn’t forestall him from serving several phrases in the New Zealand Parliament for the Green Celebration. Locke’s Green Get together parliamentary colleagues included Sue Bradford, formerly of the pro-China Staff Communist League, and Russel Norman, who began in politics in Australia with the pro-Cuba Socialist Staff Celebration and now heads Greenpeace New Zealand.
A number of other New Zealand Green Celebration leaders, including former co-leader Metiria Turei, have ties to Cuban Ambassador to New Zealand Maria del Carmen Herrera Caseiro.
Across the Tasman Sea, in Australia, the state of affairs is analogous.
On Easter 1994, New Zealand Green Social gathering co-leader Jeanette Fitzsimons spoke at an International Green Left Convention in Sydney on ladies in politics.
Her co-panelists have been Dulce Maria Pereira (Staff Celebration of Brazil), Luciana Castellina (a member of the European Parliament and directorate member of the Italian Celebration of Communist Refoundation), and Christabel Chamarette, (Australian Greens senator from Western Australia).
Australian Greens Sen. Lee Rhiannon was raised in a Stalinist household and joined the pro-Soviet Socialist Social gathering of Australia (SPA) at its founding conference, which adopted its cut up from the Communist Celebration of Australia (CPA). She served on the SPA central committee’s youth subcommittee and developed shut relations with Soviet, Czechoslovak, and East German communist youth groups. In 1977, Rhiannon led a SPA delegation to Moscow at the invitation of Soviet chief Leonid Brezhnev’s hardline regime.
At an October 2000 seminar commemorating the CPA’s founding, Rhiannon reportedly “argued that a broad-based left movement is being built already” and that the “Greens is closest to the best of the CPA’s politics and methods.” In Might 2010, she addressed the Australian Left Renewal Convention, “lamenting her job in holding the Greens on a left-wing trajectory.
“The challenge to keep the Greens Left is huge and I’m convinced social movements are the key to that. This is the way to keep the pressure on left parliamentarians so that they work to advance the social objectives of our movement, not just their party’s political interests,” she said, in response to Australian journal The Month-to-month.
The CPA collapsed in 1994 as a way to set up the Sydney-based SEARCH Foundation, which, in flip, has shut ties to the Australian Greens.
The Green movement has, at occasions, been accused of appearing as an agent of “economic warfare” for overseas powers.
In June 2018, Republican leaders of the U.S. Home Natural Assets Committee launched a probe into what they described as potential “undue influence” by the government of China over a number one U.S.-based environmental group.
Their goal, the 1.Three-million-member Natural Assets Defense Council (NRDC), has sued the Trump administration repeatedly over its efforts to roll back harmful environmental laws and has worked in China for many years to “promote clean energy and a retreat from reliance on fossil fuels.”
Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah), the committee chairman, and Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-Ark.), chairman of its oversight and investigations subcommittee, requested that the NRDC flip over documentation of any payments it has acquired from Chinese language officials. Additionally they requested for documentation of NRDC’s registration as a “foreign agent,” or an “explanation of why the environmental group should not be registered as required by law for those who lobby on behalf of a foreign government.”
Of their letter, the congressmen wrote: “The Committee is concerned about the NRDC’s role in aiding China’s perception management efforts with respect to pollution control and its international standing on environmental issues in ways that may be detrimental to the United States. … The NRDC’s relationship with China has many of the criteria identified by U.S. intelligence agencies and law enforcement as putting an entity at risk of being influenced or coerced by foreign interests.”
NDRC president Rhea Suh had visited China in 2016 and said: “What I noticed on my trip … was a reminder that China is doing so much to deal with its problems at house and to help battle climate change—starting with the wind turbines I noticed from my practice window as I traveled from Shanghai to Beijing.
“China nonetheless accounts for 27 % of the international carbon footprint. Add to the that U.S. share—another 15.5 %—and the two nations collectively produce about 43 % of all international carbon pollution.
“That’s why fixing this problem starts with our countries, the United States and China. And it’s one more reason I’m so proud of the work NRDC has done in China since first starting our clean energy efforts there 20 years ago.”
Suh was President Barack Obama’s assistant secretary for policy management and price range in the Department of the Inside. She can also be a 2007 graduate of the Oakland, California-based Rockwood Leadership Institute, a faculty for radical “community organizers” that is intently affiliated with the pro-China communist group Freedom Street Socialist Organization (FRSO).
Rockwood has graduated tons of of environmental activists, including the leadership of most main U.S. “green” organizations. Amongst them are Collin O’Mara, president and chief government officer of the National Wildlife Federation; Peggy Clark, managing director of Aspen International Health and Improvement at The Aspen Institute; and Michael Brune, government director of the Sierra Club.
Virtually all U.S. environmental leaders may be related to Marxist teams of one stripe or one other.
If pro-China environmental groups can weaken the U.S. financial system with over-regulation and the elimination of low cost fossil fuels, China will quickly have an financial (and army) benefit over its No. 1 competitor: the United States.
Vladimir Putin’s Russia is enjoying an analogous recreation in using “environmental” groups to shut down “fracking” in Europe and the United States. Fracking is a drilling know-how that has unleashed large amounts of underground oil and pure fuel that typical drilling couldn’t attain. Russia needs to stop fracking to keep Japanese Europe depending on Russian power and to weaken the U.S. financial system and its army preparedness.
In line with Jacob Grandstaff of the Capital Research Middle, “Russia has successfully stopped fracking efforts in Eastern Europe through phony environmentalist and media campaigns, and is now attempting to disrupt the surge in American natural gas production that is quickly bringing the U.S. into energy independence, and creating threatening unwanted competition for the Russian energy in Europe.”
Intelligence providers have discovered that Russia is closely invested in anti-fracking campaigns in Europe and North America. In response to the National Evaluation, “In 2015 alone, the intelligence community found that RT, Russia’s state-run media outlet, produced over 60 anti-fracking stories.”
In July 2017, Republican Reps. Lamar Smith and Randy Weber, both of Texas, wrote a letter to U.S. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin demanding that he investigate the firm Klein Ltd., which was reportedly funneling hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Sea Change Foundation—a 501(c)(Three) organization—which passes money along to anti-fracking campaigns organized by the Sierra Club and comparable groups.
“This scheme may violate federal law and certainly distorts the U.S. energy market,” Smith stated, in line with the Capital Research Middle.
The U.S. environmental motion goes into overdrive right now pushing the Green New Deal (GND) made well-known by socialist freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). The left needs to set up a congressional select committee to “counter climate change.”
To date, backed by 45 Democratic Representatives, GND objectives embrace halving the U.S. army price range and the full elimination of fossil fuels by 2030.
The proposed congressional select committee would “have authority to develop a detailed national, industrial, economic mobilization plan” to make the U.S. financial system “greenhouse gas emissions neutral.”
“The Select Committee’s detailed national plan would also have the goal ‘to promote economic and environmental justice and equality.’ The draft specifically mentions spending $1 trillion over 10 years, in addition to extensive taxes and regulations to steer the economy and society as the 15 committee members see fit,” Robert P. Murphy, a senior fellow at the Mises Institute, wrote.
“Steering the economy” by committee and “economic and environmental justice and equality” are socialism by one other identify. It’s also a recipe for an entire economic meltdown. Wouldn’t Russia and China relish that prospect?
The GND is being closely promoted by all of the nation’s main “green” groups, with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and the pro-China Communist Get together USA (CPUSA) motto “People and nature before profits.”
The concept itself came out of the Sunrise Motion, which, in turn, arose out the Scholar Energy Community, and comparable fronts for DSA and the pro-China FRSO.
Whereas there are a number of respectable environmental organizations on the market, the bulk are more fascinated by destroying Western “capitalism” than in preserving our natural world.
The Green movement is mostly a “red” movement. Our surroundings can greatest be preserved and enhanced by higher protection of property rights in a free-market financial system. Personal people—not socialist governments—are the greatest stewards of the surroundings. China and the previous Soviet bloc proved that point once and for all.
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the writer and do not necessarily mirror the views of The Epoch Occasions.