Chapter Eleven: Desecrating the Arts

The specter of communism didn’t disappear with the disintegration of the Communist Celebration in Japanese Europe

The Epoch Occasions is serializing a translation from the Chinese language of a brand new ebook, How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World, by the editorial group of the 9 Commentaries on the Communist Social gathering.

Desk of Contents


1. The Conventional Family Laid Down by God

2. Communism’s Purpose to Remove the Family

three. Communism’s Promotion of Promiscuity

four. The Follow of Spouse-Sharing Underneath Communism
a. Spouse-Sharing in the Soviet Union
b. Sexual Liberation in Yan’an

5. How Communism Destroys Households in the West
a. Selling Sexual Liberation
b. Selling Feminism and Spurning the Conventional Family



Since the 1960s, a spread of anti-traditional actions, together with trendy feminism, sexual liberation, and homosexual rights have risen to prominence in the West. The establishment of the household has been hit the hardest. In the United States, the Family Regulation Reform Act of 1969 gave a inexperienced mild to unilateral divorce. Different nations quickly rolled out comparable legal guidelines.

In the United States, the divorce-to-marriage ratio greater than doubled from the 1960s to the 1980s. In the 1950s, about 11 % of the youngsters born in a married household noticed their mother and father divorced, and in 1970, the ratio soared to 50 %. [1] In accordance with the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC), greater than 40 % of new child infants in the United States in 2016 have been born out of wedlock. In 1956, this determine was lower than 5 %. [2]

In conventional societies in the East and the West, chastity in relations between women and men was seen as a advantage. At present, it’s considered quaint and even ridiculous. The identical-sex marriage motion, accompanied by the feminist motion, has sought to legally redefine the household and marriage. A regulation professor who’s at present a member of the U.S. Federal Equal Employment Alternative Fee initiated a declaration in 2006 referred to as “Beyond Same-Sex Marriage: A New Strategic Vision for All Our Families and Relationships.” It advocated that folks type any type of new household, in accordance with no matter wishes they could have (together with polygamous marriages, joint homosexual-couple households, and so forth). The professor additionally argued that the conventional marriage and household shouldn’t take pleasure in extra authorized rights than some other type of “family.” [3]

In public faculties, premarital intercourse and homosexuality, which have been considered shameful for hundreds of years in conventional society, haven’t solely been instilled as regular, however in some faculties, they’re even tacitly or explicitly inspired. On this view, a toddler’s sexual orientation ought to be freely developed and chosen, with the apparent outcome of a rise in homosexuality, bisexuality, transgenderism, and so forth. For instance, in 2012 the Rhode Island Faculty District introduced that it was forbidden for public faculties to carry parent-daughter and mother-daughter dance events, and declared that public faculties haven’t any proper to instill in youngsters concepts comparable to women like to bop and boys like baseball. [4]

The development towards gradual destruction of the conventional household is now apparent. The elimination of the household advocated by communism will turn out to be a actuality earlier than the long-promised elimination of class variations.

In Western societies, there are various points to the destruction of the household. This consists of the influence not solely of feminism, sexual liberation, and the gay motion, but in addition the broader social backdrop of left-wing advocacy, progressivism, and the like, all of that are claimed to be beneath the banners of “freedom,” “fairness,” “rights,” and “liberation.” These concepts are buttressed explicitly and implicitly by legal guidelines, authorized interpretations, and financial insurance policies supported by fellow ideologues. All of it has the impact of inducing individuals to desert and rework the idea of the conventional marriage and household.

These ideologies originate from the starting of the nineteenth century and are deeply infused with communist elements. The evil specter of communism excels at steady mutation and deception, which has led to fixed confusion about what precisely individuals are supporting once they endorse these insurance policies and ideologies. The result’s immersion in a worldview whose parameters have been set by communist concepts. The tragic state of affairs in the present day — the degradation of the conventional household and other people’s confusion about the true nature of this development — is the outcome of the meticulous planning and gradual implementation of the spirit of communism over the previous 2 hundred years.

The consequence is that not solely is the household eradicated as a primary unit of social stability, however conventional morality established by God can also be destroyed, and the position the household performs in passing on and nurturing the subsequent era in a framework of conventional beliefs can also be misplaced. Thus the youthful era is unconstrained by conventional concepts and beliefs, and develop into playthings for ideological possession by the communist specter.

1. The Conventional Family Laid Down by God

In the conventional cultures of the East and West, marriage was established by gods and is taken into account to be organized by Heaven. As soon as shaped, the bond of marriage can’t be damaged. Each women and men have been created by gods in line with their very own photographs, and they’re all equal earlier than gods. At the similar time, gods additionally made women and men totally different bodily, and established respective roles for them. In the Western custom, ladies are the bone of males’s bones and flesh of their flesh. [5] A person should love his spouse as if she have been half of his personal physique, and if crucial, sacrifice himself to guard his spouse.

In flip, a lady ought to cooperate with and assist her husband, making the couple an integral entire. Males are chargeable for working onerous and making a dwelling to help the household, whereas ladies endure in childbirth. All this stems from the totally different unique sins individuals carry.

Equally, in Japanese conventional tradition, males are related to the yang of yin and yang, which is symbolically related with the solar and the sky, and which thus calls for that they constantly attempt to make progress and shoulder the duty of taking care of the household via arduous occasions. Ladies belong to the yin precept, symbolically related to the earth, which suggests they bear and nurture every little thing with nice advantage. They need to be yielding and thoughtful of others, and have the obligation to help their husbands and educate their youngsters. Solely when women and men work nicely in their very own roles can the yin and the yang be harmonized and youngsters develop and develop in a wholesome method.

Conventional households play the position of transmitting beliefs, morality, and sustaining the stability of society. The household is the cradle of perception and the bond for the transmission of values. Mother and father are the first academics in youngsters’s lives. If youngsters can study conventional virtues resembling selflessness, humility, gratitude, endurance, and extra from their mother and father’ phrases and deeds, they may profit for the relaxation of their lives.

Conventional married life additionally helps women and men develop collectively in morality. It requires husbands and wives to deal with their feelings and wishes with a brand new angle and to be thoughtful and tolerant of one another. That is basically totally different from the concept of cohabitation. Human feelings are fickle. If the couple are collectively as a result of they wish to be collectively and break up as a result of they don’t wish to anymore, the relationship isn’t a lot totally different from a standard friendship unbounded by marriage. Marx finally hoped for widespread “unconstrained sexual intercourse,” [6] which of course is about dissolving the conventional marriage and thus in the finish eliminating the establishment of the household.

2. Communism’s Purpose to Remove the Family

Communism believes that the household is a type of personal possession. To remove personal possession, subsequently, it follows that the household also needs to be eradicated. The unique precept of communism regards financial elements to be key in figuring out the type of household relationships shaped. Modern Marxian-Freudianism regards sexual want as the key to questions related to the household. The widespread attribute of these two ideologies is their casting apart of primary human morality, their worship of materialism, want, and pragmatic pursuits. All of this merely turns people into beasts. It’s a twisted ideology that has the impact of destroying the household by corrupting thought.

The unbelievable delusion that sits at the coronary heart of communism is the doctrine of the liberation of mankind. This manifests not merely as supposed liberation in an financial sense, but in addition the liberation of mankind itself. The other of liberation, of course, is oppression. So the place does the oppression that have to be resisted come from? Communism’s reply is that the oppression comes from individuals’s personal notions, that are imposed by conventional social morality: The patriarchy of the conventional household construction oppresses ladies; conventional sexual morality oppressed human nature, and so forth.

The feminism and gay rights actions of later generations inherited after which expanded upon this communist-inspired principle of liberation. It results in a full battery of ideas in opposition to conventional marriage and household, in addition to sexual liberation, homosexuality, and the like. All of these concepts have turn out to be instruments utilized by the devil to undermine and destroy the household. Communism units itself towards and needs to overthrow all conventional ethical values, as clearly said in The Communist Manifesto.

three. Communism’s Promotion of Promiscuity

The communist evil specter units itself towards the conventional household, which it needs to destroy. Early in the nineteenth century, Robert Owen, a consultant of utopian socialism, sowed the seeds of the devil’s ideology. A communist ideological pioneer, Owen established the utopian group New Concord in Indiana in 1824. (It failed two years later.) On the day the group was established, he declared:

I now declare, to you and to the world, that Man, as much as this hour, has been, in all elements of the earth, a slave to a Trinity of the most monstrous evils that might be mixed to inflict psychological and bodily evil upon his entire race. I refer to non-public, or particular person property — absurd and irrational techniques of faith — and marriage, based on particular person property mixed with some one of these irrational techniques of faith. [7]

After Owen died, one other influential utopian communist was the Frenchmen Charles Fourier, whose ideas deeply influenced Marx and Marxists. After his demise, his disciples introduced his ideas into the Revolution of 1848 and the Paris Commune, and later unfold them to the United States. Fourier first coined the time period “feminist” (“féminisme” in French).

In his very best communist society (referred to as the Phalanx), the conventional household was scorned, and bacchanals and orgies have been praised as absolutely liberating human inside passions. He additionally declared that a truthful society ought to take care of those that are sexually rejected (reminiscent of the aged or unprepossessing) to make sure that everybody has the “right” to sexual gratification. He believed that any type of sexual gratification, together with sexual abuse, even incest and bestiality, ought to be allowed so long as it’s consensual. Fourier, subsequently, may be regarded the pioneer of queer principle, a department of the modern gay motion (together with LGBTQ and the like).

As a result of of the affect of Owen and particularly of Fourier, dozens of communist utopian communes have been arrange in the United States in the nineteenth century, although most have been short-lived and led to failure. The longest was the Oneida Commune established on the foundation of Fourier’s principle, which lasted 32 years. The commune despised conventional monogamous marriages and advocated polygamy and group intercourse. Members received a “fair” sexual entry by being allotted the alternative every week to have intercourse with anybody of their selecting. In the finish, the founder, John Humphrey Noyes, fled for worry of a lawsuit by the church. The commune was pressured to desert wife-sharing, although Noyes later wrote books and have become the originator of Bible Communism.

Communism’s promiscuous gene is an inevitable consequence of its theoretical improvement. From the very starting, the demon of communism tempted individuals to desert godly teachings, to disclaim the divine, and to disclaim unique sin.

Based on this logic, social issues initially brought on by the degeneration of human morality have been attributed to non-public possession. Communism leads individuals to consider that if personal property is destroyed, individuals won’t struggle over it. Nevertheless, even when all property is shared, individuals may additionally have conflicts over their spouses. Subsequently, utopian socialists brazenly use a system of wife-sharing to unravel such issues inherent in human nature.

These communist “paradises” both immediately challenged the conventional household or advocated a system of widespread wives, which led native communities, church buildings, and governments to see them as a problem to conventional morality and ethics, and take motion to suppress them. The scandalous communist wealth and wife-sharing turned extensively recognized.

The failure of utopian communes taught Marx and Engels a lesson: It was not but the time to brazenly advocate promiscuous wife-sharing. Though the objective of eliminating the household in The Communist Manifesto had not modified, they adopted a extra hid strategy to placing ahead their theories and destroying households.

After the dying of Marx, Engels revealed the e-book “The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State, in the Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan” to finish Marx’s concept on the household and additional expound the Marxian view of marriage: “[The emergence of monogamy] is based on the supremacy of the man, the express purpose being to produce children of undisputed paternity; such paternity is demanded because these children are later to come into their father’s property as his natural heirs. It is distinguished from pairing marriage by the much greater strength of the marriage tie, which can no longer be dissolved at either partner’s wish.” [8]

Engels argued that monogamy was based mostly round personal property, and that when all property is shared, there can be a model new mannequin of marriage based mostly purely on love. Superficially, it sounds so noble — however it isn’t.

The tried defenses of Marx and Engels appear feeble in mild of the precise implementation of communist concept. Emotions are unreliable. If an individual loves somebody right now and one other individual tomorrow, does that not encourage promiscuity? The promiscuity that happened after the institution of the former Soviet Union and the Chinese language communist regime (see the following part) is the truth is the outcome of utilized Marxist doctrine.

Relationships between husbands and wives aren’t all the time clean crusing. The vow “till death do us part” throughout a standard wedding ceremony is a vow to God. It additionally represents the concept that each events are ready to face and overcome all hardships collectively. What maintains a wedding is just not merely emotion or emotions, but in addition a way of duty. Treating one’s different half, the youngsters, and the household with care transforms each the husband and spouse right into a mature man and lady with a way of ethical duty.

Marx and Engels boasted in The Origin of the Family, Personal Property, and the State that in a communist society, personal property turns into public; house responsibilities turns into professionalized; there’s no want to fret about taking care of youngsters because it’s the nation’s duty to take care of and educate the youngsters.

They wrote: “This removes all the anxiety about the ‘consequences,’ which today is the most essential social — moral as well as economic — factor that prevents a girl from giving herself completely to the man she loves. Will not that suffice to bring about the gradual growth of unconstrained sexual intercourse and with it a more tolerant public opinion in regard to a maiden’s honor and a woman’s shame?” [9]

What Marx and Engels promoted, although utilizing the phrases “freedom,” “liberation,” and “love” to hide the reality, was nothing greater than the full abandonment of private ethical duty. They inspired individuals to behave solely on their wishes. Nevertheless, throughout Marx’s period and that of Fourier, most individuals had not deserted godly teachings completely and have been cautious of communism’s promotion of promiscuity. But even Marx himself might hardly have imagined the rationalizations that folks would provide you with, in the twentieth century and following, to embrace the sexual chaos of Marxist thought and press ahead the objective of eliminating the household.

The purple demon organized sure people to sow these seeds of prurience and deviance. It additionally systematically organized for luring individuals to comply with their wishes and oppose godly teachings, in order to progressively deprave them, till lastly attaining the objective of eliminating the household. This finally brings about the deviation of the human coronary heart and leads individuals to fall into the devil’s grasp.

four. The Follow of Spouse-Sharing Underneath Communism

The sexual chaos described above is an innate half of communism. Marx is believed to have raped his maid and had Engels increase the baby. Engels cohabitated with two sisters. Lenin carried out an extramarital affair with a lady named Inesa for ten years, and in addition dedicated adultery with a French lady. He additionally contracted with syphilis consorting with prostitutes. Stalin was equally lecherous and is understood to have taken benefit of different individuals’s wives.

After the Soviets seized energy, they instituted the apply of wife-sharing. The Soviet Union at the time may be seen as the pioneer of sexual liberation in the West. In the tenth version of the Russian journal Rodina, printed in 1990, the phenomenon of wife-sharing throughout early Soviet rule was uncovered. The piece additionally described the personal lives of Soviet leaders Trotsky, Bukharin, Antonov, Kollontai, and others, saying that they have been as informal as canine of their sexual actions.

a. Spouse-Sharing in the Soviet Union

As early as 1904, Lenin wrote: “Lust can emancipate the energy of the spirit — not for pseudo-family values, but for the victory of socialism must this blood-clot be done away with.” [10]

At a gathering of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Celebration, Leon Trotsky proposed that when the Bolsheviks seize energy, new elementary rules of sexual relations can be drafted. Communist concept calls for the destruction of the household and the transition to a interval of unconstrained satisfaction of sexual want. Trotsky additionally stated that the duty to teach youngsters resides solely with the state.

In the letter to Lenin in 1911, Trotsky wrote: “Undoubtedly, sexual oppression is the main means of enslaving a person. While such oppression exists, there can be no question of real freedom. The family, like a bourgeois institution, has completely outlived itself. It is necessary to speak more about this to the workers. …”

Lenin replied: “And not only the family. All prohibitions relating to sexuality must be abolished. … We have something to learn from the suffragettes: Even the ban on same-sex love should be lifted.” [11]

After the Bolsheviks seized energy, Lenin introduced out a collection of laws successfully abolishing marriage and the punishment of homosexuality. [12]

At the moment, there was additionally the slogan “Down with shame!” This was half of the Bolshevik try and create the “New Man” of socialist ideology, and typically even included roaming the streets bare and hysterically screaming slogans like “Shame is in the bourgeois past of the Soviet people.” [13]

On December 19, 1918, to rejoice the commemoration day of the decree successfully abolishing marriage, lesbian teams celebrated. Trotsky writes in his memoirs that the information of lesbians celebrating with a parade made Lenin very comfortable. Lenin additionally inspired extra individuals to march bare. [14]

In 1923, the Soviet novel The Loves of Three Generations popularized the phrase “glass-of-waterism.” The writer, Individuals’s Commissar for Social Welfare Alexandra Kollontai, was a revolutionary who fought her method into the Bolshevik faction from a standard household, in search of “women’s liberation.” The “glass-of-waterism” promoted by the novel is, the truth is, a synonym for sexual indulgence: In communist society, satisfying sexual want is as regular and straightforward as consuming a glass of water. “Glass-of-waterism” was widespread amongst manufacturing unit staff and particularly teenage college students.

“The current morality of our youth is summarized as follows,” the well-known Communist Smidovich wrote in the Pravda newspaper (March 21, 1925):

Each member, even a minor, of the Communist Youth League and each scholar of the ‘Rabfak’ (Communist Social gathering coaching faculty), has the proper to fulfill his sexual want. This idea has grow to be an axiom, and abstinence is taken into account a notion of bourgeois. If a person lusts after a younger woman, whether or not she is a scholar, a employee or perhaps a school-age woman, then the woman should obey his lust, in any other case it is going to be thought-about a bourgeois daughter, unworthy to be referred to as a real communist. … [15]

Divorce additionally turned normalized and widespread. “The divorce rate skyrocketed to levels unseen in human history. In short order, it seemed as though everyone in Moscow had a divorce,” Paul Kengor famous in his e-book Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage. In 1926, the influential American journal The Atlantic revealed an article about the astonishing state of affairs in the USSR, with the title “The Russian Effort to Abolish Marriage.” [16]

The phenomenon of “Swedish families” — which has nothing to do with Sweden, however refers to a big group of women and men dwelling collectively and interesting in informal intercourse — additionally appeared throughout this era of sexual liberation. This opened the doorways to promiscuity, sexual chaos, homosexualty, ethical collapse, the destruction of households, sexually transmitted illnesses, rape, and extra. [17]

Following the enlargement of socialist communes, these “Swedish families” unfold throughout the Soviet Union. This was generally known as the “nationalization” or “socialization” of ladies. The Socialist Ladies in Yekaterinburg, March 1918, are a tragic instance: After the Bolsheviks seized the metropolis, they issued an ordinance that younger ladies between ages of 16 to 25 have to be “socialized.” The order was carried out by a number of Celebration officers, and ten younger ladies have been “socialized.” [18]

The Bolsheviks shortly tightened their insurance policies on intercourse at the finish of 1920s. Throughout a dialog with feminist activist Clara Zetkin, Lenin deplored the “glass-of-waterism” philosophy, calling it “anti-Marxist” and “anti-social.” [19] The rationale was as a result of sexual liberation caused an undesirable byproduct — many new child infants. Many have been deserted. Once more it was proven that the destruction of the household ultimately leads to societal collapse.

b. Sexual Liberation in Yan’an

Throughout the CCP’s early years, the circumstances have been just like that of the Soviet Union. In fact, these communist events are all varieties of toxic fruits from the similar tree. Chen Duxiu, an early communist chief, was recognized for his debauched private life. Based on the memoirs of Zheng Chaolin and Chen Bilan, Qu Qiubai, Cai Hesen, Zhang Tailei, Xiang Jingyu, Peng Shuzhi, and others had a considerably confused sexual historical past, and their angle towards intercourse was just like the “glass-of-waterism” of the early Soviet revolutionaries.

“Sexual liberation” was embraced not solely by the Social gathering’s mental leaders, but in addition by strange individuals dwelling in the CCP’s early “Soviets” (revolutionary enclaves arrange earlier than the Nationalist Get together was overthrown) in Hubei, Henan, and Anhui. As a result of the promotion of equality of ladies, and absolute freedom of marriage and divorce, revolutionary work was typically disrupted so as to fulfill sexual want.

Younger individuals in the Soviet areas typically engaged in romantic affairs in the identify of connecting with the plenty. It wasn’t uncommon for younger ladies to have six or seven sexual companions. Based on the Assortment of Revolutionary Historic Paperwork in the Hubei-Henan-Anhui Soviet Districts, amongst native celebration chiefs in locations like Hong’an, Huangma, Huangqi, Guangshan, and elsewhere, “about three- quarters of them kept sexual relations with dozens or hundreds of women.” [20]

In late spring of 1931, when Zhang Guotao took cost of the Hubei-Henan-Anhui Soviet districts, he famous that syphilis was so widespread that he needed to report back to the Celebration Central for docs who focus on treating the illness. A few years later, in his memoirs, he nonetheless vividly recalled tales of ladies in the Soviet districts being sexually harassed, together with some of the senior generals’ mistresses. [21]

In 1937, Li Kenong was serving as director of the CCP’s Eighth Route Military Workplace in Nanjing, making him chargeable for amassing army stipends, drugs, and provides. On one event, when checking the drugs record of the Eighth Route Military, the Nationwide Authorities employees discovered a big amount of medicine for treating sexually transmitted illness. The employees requested Li Kenong, “Are there a lot of people in your army suffering from this disease?” Li wasn’t positive what to say, so he lied and stated it was to deal with the native individuals. [22]

By the 1930s, nevertheless, sexual freedom got here to be perceived as a menace to the regime. The identical drawback of social disintegration present in Soviet Russia was obvious, and Purple Military conscripts started worrying that their wives would take up extramarital affairs or divorce them as soon as they joined the revolution. This affected the fight effectiveness of the troops. Furthermore, the development of promiscuity appeared to strengthen the notoriety of the “common property, common wives” slogan. Thus, Soviet districts started implementing insurance policies defending army marriages, limiting the quantity of divorces, and extra.

5. How Communism Destroys Households in the West

The evil spirit’s ideological tendencies discover their origins in the nineteenth century. After a century of transformation and evolution in the West, they lastly got here to the fore in the United States in the 1960s.

In the 1960s, influenced and inspired by neo-Marxism and numerous different radical ideologies, social and cultural actions manipulated by the evil spirit appeared. These embrace the hippie counterculture, the radical New Left, the feminist motion, and the sexual revolution. The turbulence of these social actions was a fierce assault towards America’s political system, conventional worth system, and social material.

The actions shortly unfold to Europe, quickly altering the means the mainstream considered society, the household, intercourse, and cultural values. Whereas this was happening, the homosexual rights motion was additionally rising. The confluence of these forces led to the weakening of conventional Western household values ​​and the decline of the establishment of the conventional household and its centrality in social life. At the similar time, social turmoil triggered a collection of issues, together with the proliferation of pornography, the unfold of drug abuse, the collapse of sexual morality, the rise of the juvenile crime price, and the enlargement of teams relying on social welfare.

a. Selling Sexual Liberation

Sexual liberation (also referred to as the sexual revolution) originated in the United States in the 1960s. Its subsequent speedy unfold by means of the world dealt a devastating blow to conventional ethical values, particularly conventional household values and sexual morality.

The evil spirit made ample preparations for utilizing sexual liberation towards Western societies. The free love motion paved the option to progressively erode and disintegrate conventional household values. The idea of “free love” violates conventional sexual morality, and argues that sexual exercise of all types ought to be free from social regulation. On this view, particular person sexual actions, together with marriage, abortion, and adultery, shouldn’t be restricted by the authorities or regulation, nor topic to social sanction.

The followers of Charles Fourier and the Christian Socialist John Humphrey Noyes have been the first to coin the time period “free love.”

In current occasions, the important promoters of free love concepts are virtually all socialists or individuals deeply influenced by socialist thought. For instance, amongst these pioneering the free love motion in Britain was socialist thinker Edward Carpenter, who was additionally an early activist for homosexual rights. The homosexual rights motion’s most well-known advocate, British thinker Bertrand Russell, was an avowed socialist and a member of the Fabian Society. He claimed that morality shouldn’t restrict humanity’s instinctive drive towards pleasure and advocated premarital and extramarital intercourse.

The primary forerunner of the free love motion in France was Émile Armand, in his early days, an anarcho-communist who later constructed on Fourier’s utopian communism, based French individualist anarchism (which falls beneath the broader class of socialism), and advocated promiscuity, homosexuality, and bisexuality. The pioneer of the free love motion in Australia was Chummy Fleming, an anarchist (one other socialist offshoot).

The free love motion in America bore essential fruit — Playboy, the erotic journal based in 1953. The journal made use of coated paper to create the impression that it was inventive and never seedy. It additionally used costly shade printing, with the end result that pornographic content material sometimes considered low-class and vulgar swiftly entered the mainstream, and Playboy turned a “high-class” leisure journal. For greater than half a century, it has unfold the toxin of sexual freedom to individuals round the world, and  has laid siege to conventional morals and perceptions relating to intercourse.

In the center of the twentieth century, with hippie tradition growing in reputation and free love gaining widespread acceptance, the sexual revolution (also referred to as sexual liberation) made its official debut. The time period “sexual revolution” was coined by Wilhelm Reich, the founder of communist psychoanalysis and a German communist. He mixed Marxism with Freudian psychoanalysis, and believed that the former liberated individuals from “economic oppression,” whereas the latter liberated individuals from “sexual repression.”

One other founder of sexual liberation concept was Herbert Marcuse of the Frankfurt Faculty. Throughout the Western counterculture motion of the 1960s, his slogan “make love, not war” embedded the notion of sexual liberation deep inside individuals’s hearts.

Since then, with the publication of Alfred Kinsey’s Sexual Conduct in the Human Male and Sexual Conduct in the Human Feminine, and the widespread use of oral contraceptives, the notion of sexual liberation swept by way of the West. It’s value mentioning that modern students have found distorted statistical knowledge in Kinsey’s work, in addition to exaggeration, over-simplification, and different fallacies pushed by his political and ideological commitments. Kinsey got down to present that extramarital intercourse, gay intercourse, and so forth have been widespread, and thus to direct society to simply accept the normalization of these phenomena, a activity at which he was largely profitable. [22]

Unexpectedly, being “sexually liberated” turned trendy. Amongst younger individuals, promiscuity got here to be thought-about regular. Teenagers who admitted to being virgins have been ridiculed by their friends. Knowledge present that of those that turned 15 years of age between 1954 to 1963 (the 60s era), 82 % had premarital intercourse earlier than the age of 30. [24] In the 2010s, new brides who have been nonetheless virgins earlier than they married numbered solely 5 %, whereas 18 % of brides had beforehand had 10 or extra sexual companions earlier than marriage. [25] The cultural mainstream has turn into saturated with intercourse, together with in literature, movie, promoting, and tv.

b. Selling Feminism and Spurning the Conventional Family

The Communist Ideology Behind the Feminist Motion

The feminist motion is one other software the communist specter has used to destroy the household. When it started in the eighteenth century, the feminist motion (also called first-wave feminism) began in Europe and advocated that ladies must be accorded the similar remedy as males in schooling, employment, and politics. The middle of the feminist motion shifted from Europe to the United States in the mid-nineteenth century.

When first-wave feminism began, the notion of the conventional household nonetheless had a robust basis in society, and the feminist motion didn’t advocate instantly difficult the conventional household. The influential feminists at the moment, comparable to Mary Wollstonecraft of eighteenth-century England, Margaret Fuller of nineteenth-century America, and John Stuart Mill of nineteenth-century England, all advocated that normally ladies ought to prioritize the household after marriage, that the potential of ladies ought to be developed inside the area of the household, and that ladies ought to enrich themselves for the sake of the household (resembling educating the youngsters, managing the household, and so forth). They thought, nevertheless, that some particular ladies who’re notably gifted shouldn’t be constrained by society, and ought to be free to make the most of their skills, even to the extent of competing with males.

After the 1920s, when the proper for ladies to vote was written into regulation in lots of nations, the first wave of ladies’s rights actions progressively receded. In the following years, with the impression of the Nice Melancholy and World Struggle II, the feminist motion primarily laid down its flag.

At the similar time, the communist specter started to sow the seeds of destruction for conventional marriage and sexual ethics. The early utopian socialists in the nineteenth century laid the path for contemporary radical feminist actions. François Marie Charles Fourier, referred to as “the father of feminism,” declared that marriage turns ladies into personal property. Robert Owen cursed marriage as evil. The concepts of these utopian socialists have been inherited and developed by later feminists, together with, for instance, Frances Wright, who in the nineteenth century, inherited the concepts of Fourier and advocated sexual freedom for ladies.

The British feminist activist Anna Wheeler inherited Owen’s concepts, fiercely condemning marriage for supposedly turning ladies into slaves. Socialist feminist activists have been additionally an necessary half of the feminist motion in the nineteenth century. At the moment, amongst the most influential feminist publications in France have been La Voix des Femmes, the very first feminist publication in France, and Free Ladies (La Femme Libre, later renamed La Tribune des Femmes), in addition to La Politique des Femmes, amongst others. The founders of these publications have been both followers of Fourier or of Henri de Saint-Simon, the advocate of modernity. As a result of of the shut connection between feminism and socialism, the authorities scrutinized feminism.

When the first wave of ladies’s rights actions proceeded in full swing, the devil of communism additionally made preparations to introduce a spread of radical ideas to assault conventional ideas of household and marriage, paving the approach for the extra radical feminist motion that adopted.

The second wave of feminist actions started in the United States in the late 1960s, then unfold to Western and Northern Europe, and shortly expanded to the whole Western world. American society in the late 1960s went by means of a interval of turmoil, with the civil rights motion, anti-Vietnam Warfare motion, and numerous radical social tendencies. Feminism, taking benefit of this distinctive set of circumstances, emerged in a extra radical pressure and have become in style.

The cornerstone of this wave of feminist actions was the ebook The Female Mystique by Betty Friedan, revealed in 1963, in addition to the Nationwide Group for Ladies (NOW), which she based. Utilizing the perspective of a suburban middle-class housewife, Friedan fiercely criticized the conventional household position of ladies, and argued that the conventional picture of a cheerful, content material, joyful housewife is a fable cast by a patriarchal society. She argued that middle-class suburban households are “a comfortable concentration camp” for American ladies, and that trendy educated ladies ought to reject the sense of accomplishment attained by means of supporting their husbands and educating their youngsters, however as an alternative understand their value outdoors the household. [26]

A couple of years later, extra radical feminists dominated the Nationwide Ladies’s Group, inheriting and creating Friedan’s concepts. They stated that ladies had been oppressed by patriarchy since historic occasions and attributed the root trigger of ladies’s oppression to the household. In response, they got here to advocate the full transformation of the social system and conventional tradition, and wrestle in all elements of human affairs — the financial system, schooling, tradition, and the household — to realize feminine equality.

Classifying a society into the oppressor and the oppressed to advocate for wrestle, liberation, and equality is strictly what communism is all about. Conventional Marxism classifies teams based on their financial statuses, whereas neo-feminist actions divide individuals based mostly on gender.

Betty Friedan, the writer of The Female Mystique, was not, as her guide described, a center class suburban housewife bored together with her house responsibilities. Daniel Horowitz, a professor at Smith School, wrote a biography of Friedan in 1998 titled Betty Friedan and the Making of The Female Mystique. His analysis reveals that Friedan, underneath her maiden identify Betty Goldstein, had been a radical socialist activist since her school years as much as the 1950s. At totally different occasions, she was knowledgeable journalist, or propagandist to be correct, for a number of radical labor unions in the orbit of the Communist Get together USA.

David Horowitz, a former leftist and no relation to Daniel Horowitz, reviewed her revealed articles to know the improvement of her views. [27] She was a member of the Younger Communist League whereas in UC–Berkeley. Friedan even requested twice, at totally different occasions, to hitch the CPUSA. Judith Hennesee, her approved biographer, additionally signifies she was a Marxist. [28]

Kate Weigand, an American scholar, factors out in her e-book Purple Feminism that feminism the truth is didn’t keep quiet in the United States from the early twentieth century to the 1960s. Throughout that interval, a big group of purple feminist writers with communist backgrounds paved the approach for the subsequent second-wave feminist motion. These embrace Susan Anthony, Eleanor Flex, Gerda Lerner, Eve Merriam, and the like. As early as 1946, Anthony utilized the Marxist analytical technique to attract an analogy between the white oppressing the black, and the male oppressing the feminine. Nevertheless, resulting from the McCarthyism of the interval, such writers not talked about their pink background. [29]

In Europe, French author Simone de Beauvoir’s iconic work The Second Intercourse ushered in the craze for the second wave of feminism. De Beauvoir was a socialist. In 1941, along with communist thinker Jean-Paul Sartre and different writers, she created Socialiste et Liberté, a French underground socialist group. With the rise of her status for feminism in the 1960s, de Beauvoir declared that she not believed in socialism, and claimed that she was solely a feminist.

She stated, “One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman.” She advocated that although intercourse is decided by physiological traits, gender is a self-perceived psychological idea shaped beneath the affect of human sociality. She argued that the temperaments of obedience, submissiveness, affection, and maternity are all derived from the “myth” rigorously designed by the patriarchy for its oppression of ladies, and advocated that ladies break via conventional notions and understand their unrestrained selves.

This mentality actually lies at the coronary heart of the damaging notions of homosexuality, bisexuality, transgenderism, and the like. Since then, numerous feminist ideas have emerged in a continuing stream, all taking a look at the world by means of the lens of ladies being oppressed by a patriarchy, which is realized by way of the establishment of the conventional household — making the household, then, an impediment to the realization of feminine equality. [30]

De Beauvoir held that ladies are restrained by their husbands as a result of marriage, and referred to as marriage as disgusting as prostitution. She refused to get married and maintained an “open relationship” with Sartre. By the similar token, Sartre additionally engaged in sexual encounters with different ladies. Her view on marriage is the normal amongst modern radical feminists. Such chaotic sexual liaisons and relationships are exactly the system of communal wives envisioned by Charles Fourier, forerunner of utopian communism in the nineteenth century.


[1] W. Bradford Wilcox, “The Evolution of Divorce,” Nationwide Affairs, Quantity 35, Spring 2018.

[2] See Desk 1–17. “Number and Percent of Births to Unmarried Women, by Race and Hispanic Origin: United States, 1940–2000,” CDC,

[3] “Beyond Same-Sex Marriage: A New Strategic Vision for All Our Families and Relationships,” Research in Gender and Sexuality, 9:2 (July 1, 2006): 161–171.

[4] Victoria Cavaliere, “Rhode Island School District Bans Father-Daughter, Mother-Son Events,”

[5] Genesis 2:23,

[6] Engels, Frederick. n.d., “Origins of the Family. Chapter 2 (IV),” accessed June 17, 2018.

[7] “Robert Owen, Critique of Individualism (1825–1826),” n.d., Indiana College. Accessed June 17, 2018.

[8] Engels, Frederick, n.d. “Origins of the Family. Chapter II (4.),” accessed June 17, 2018.

[9] Engels, Ibid.

[10] This translation is from the Russian: Melnichenko, Alexander, 2017. “Великая октябрьская сексуальная революция [The Great October Sexual Revolution].” Russian People Line, August 20, 2017, This and different sources draw on the work of former Menshevik Aleksandra Kollontai.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Ibid.

[13] Ibid.

[14] Ibid.

[15] Наталья Короткая,“Эрос революции: “Комсомолка, не будь мещанкой – помоги мужчине снять напряжение!”

[16] Paul Kengor, Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage (WND Books, 2015), 54.

[17] See Melnichenko (2017).

[18] Xia Hou, “The Promiscuous Gene of Communism: Sexual Liberation,” The Epoch Occasions (Chinese language version). April 9, 2017,; The Weekly Evaluation, Volumes four–5 (Nationwide Weekly Company, 1921), 232, out there at; for the incident of Pink Military commander Karaseev socializing ten women, see Olga Greig (Ольга Грейгъ), Chapter 7 of “The Revolution of the Sexes,” or “The Secret Mission of Clara Zetkin” (Революция полов, или Тайная миссия Клары Цеткин), out there at

[19] Clara Zetkin, “Lenin on the Women’s Question,” My Memorandum (transcribed from the Writings of V.I. Lenin, Worldwide Publishers, out there at

[20] Huang Wenzhi, “‘What Happened after Nora Left’: Women’s Liberation, Freedom of Marriage, and Class Revolution: A Historical Survey of the Hubei-Henan-Anhui Soviet Districts (1922–1932),” Open Occasions no. four (2013). Chinese language: 黃文治:〈 “娜拉走後怎樣”:婦女解放、婚姻自由及階級革命——以鄂豫皖蘇區為中心的歷史考察(1922~1932)〉《開放時代》,2013年第4期.

[21] Huang Wenzhi (2013), Ibid.

[22] “Yang Ning, “Why Did the Eighth Route Army Purchase Medicines for Sexual Transmitted Diseases?” The Epoch Occasions (Chinese language),

[23] Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D.; Edward W. Eichel, Kinsey, Intercourse and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a Individuals (Lafayette, Louisiana: Lochinvar-Huntington Home, 1990);  “Dr. Judith A. Reisman and her colleagues demolish the foundations of the two (Kinsey) reports.”; “Really, Dr Kinsey?” The Lancet, Vol. 337 (March 2, 1991): 547.

[24] L. B. Finer, “Trends in Premarital Sex in the United States, 1954–2003,” Public Well being Stories 122(1) (2007): 73–78.

[25] Nicholas H. Wolfinger, “Counterintuitive Trends in the Link Between Premarital Sex and Marital Stability,” Institute for Family Research,

[26] Betty Friedan, The Female Mystique (New York: W.W. Norton & Firm, 1963).

[27] David Horowitz, Salon Journal, January 1999,  

[28] Joanne Boucher, “Betty Friedan and the Radical Past of Liberal Feminism.” New Politics 9 (three).

[29] Kate Weigand, Purple Feminism: American Communism and the Making of Ladies’s Liberation (Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins College Press, 2002).

[30] Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Intercourse, trans. Constance Borde, Sheila Malovany-Chevallier (New York: Classic Books, 2011).